• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@c...>
• Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:43:50 +0100

On 28/10/2010 21:01, Pete Cordell wrote:
> But just because your schema uses the 'widget' type declared in the
> 'http://widgetlib.org' namespace shouldn't necessarily mean that
> 'http://widgetlib.org' should appear in your instance documents.

which is a justification for using a format that doesn't use namespace 
declarations in the instance, ie puts everything in no-namespace.
It doesn't justify complicating things by putting one element in a 
namespace (so having to put http://widgetlib.org in your instance 
anyway) but then switching to no-namespace for the remaining elements.

David

• References:
  • Re: Venetian Blinds vs Garden of Eden patterns for industry standards XML Schemas
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • RE: Venetian Blinds vs Garden of Eden patterns forindustry standards XML Schemas
    • From: Philip Fennell <Philip.Fennell@m...>
  • Re: Venetian Blinds vs Garden of Eden patterns for industrystandards XML Schemas
    • From: David <dlee@c...>
  • RE: Venetian Blinds vs Garden of Eden patterns forindustry standards XML Schemas
    • From: Philip Fennell <Philip.Fennell@m...>
  • Re: Venetian Blinds vs Garden of Eden patterns for industrystandards XML Schemas
    • From: David <dlee@c...>
  • RE: Venetian Blinds vs Garden of Eden patterns forindustry standards XML Schemas
    • From: Philip Fennell <Philip.Fennell@m...>
  • Re: Venetian Blinds vs Garden of Eden patterns for industry standards XML Schemas
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • Re: Venetian Blinds vs Garden of Eden patterns for industrystandards XML Schemas
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: Venetian Blinds vs Garden of Eden patterns for industry standards XML Schemas
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>