• From: rjelliffe@a...
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 01:06:33 +1000

> It's x86 assembler, and to fit my memories of assembler it would have to
> be 6502, but it's certainly more useful this way on modern platforms:
>
> http://tibleiz.net/asm-xml/
>
> (via
> <http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/10/four-short-links-8-october-201.html>)
>
> I haven't tried it, but they definitely get points for bravery.

Don't forget Cameron's parser*, which uses C/C++ intrinsic functions
(which are just SIMD assembler instructions presented as C functions.) I'd
count that as assembler.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

*http://www.balisage.net/Proceedings/vol4/author-pkg/Cameron01/BalisageVol4-Cameron01.html

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Assembly-language XML parser
    • From: Rob Cameron <cameron@c...>

• References:
  • Assembly-language XML parser
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>