Re: My report on experiments with unused namespaces
Original Message From: "David Carlisle" > It is well formed. (and parsed as such by any xml parser I've tried). But as said earlier, what does "(and parsed as such by any xml parser I've tried)." prove! I do find that the paragraph about reserved names sits uncomfortably in the spec. Maybe it should just be a note similar to that about colons in names, and rather than use the word "reserved" suggest to the reader that they might want to avoid such names. But as it sits in the main body of the text and explicitly uses the word "reserved" I take it as a constraint on what a valid Name can be and therefore has impact on the well-formedness or otherwise of a document. But I do concede that however it is written, the _intent_ may have been not to allow the reserved nature of names starting with "xml" to have any impact on the well-formedness of a document. Even so, I think as a minimum they wanted write "please, please, please don't use non-W3C names starting with 'xml', but sadly we don't have the authority to stop you doing it in this spec." At the end of the day though, I would say the pragmatic BCP approach is to not use names starting with xml other than those defined by W3C, and then only as intended. But, as Michael Kay said, the W3C does not make laws, so you're free to do what you want. Pete Cordell Codalogic Ltd Interface XML to C++ the easy way using XML C++ data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes. Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com for more info
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format