• From: Michael Ludwig <milu71@g...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 23:26:17 +0200

Max Toro schrieb am 09.04.2010 um 17:07:25 (-0400)
[Re:  To namespace or not to Namespace ....]:

> > <!PREFIX f = org.fpml>
> 
> Why not a processing instruction instead? e.g.
> 
> <?xml-prefix f="org.fpml"?>

Because the idea of a processing instruction (which can appear anywhere
in mid-stream, soit dit en passant) is to instruct the application what
to do with the data, and not what the data is in the first place.

-- 
Michael Ludwig

• References:
  • To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: David <dlee@c...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Kendall Shaw <kshaw@k...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Max Toro <maxtoroq@g...>
  • RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Max Toro <maxtoroq@g...>