[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Is it too late to fix this in XQuery 1.1 ? It should be "simply" an addition of a separate input and output default namespace declaration. Who do I have to bribe ? ------------------------- David A. Lee dlee@c... http://www.calldei.com http://www.xmlsh.org On 4/9/2010 6:12 AM, Andrew Welch wrote: > On 9 April 2010 10:37, Michael Kay<mike@s...> wrote: > >>> XQuery really messed this up big time... such a simple thing, >>> and such a huge amount of hassle caused by it. I know I'm >>> not the only one to be amazed when you first realise that is >>> what is happening. >>> >> Yes, it's definitely a usability trap: but then, so many things with >> namespaces are. >> >> My recollection of the history, at a high level of abstraction, is that I >> was constantly pointing out namespace problems to the XQuery Working Group, >> and proposing new features to deal with the problems, and the WG >> collectively was getting more and more irritated by the complexity that each >> new feature added to the language; so it got to the point where I decided it >> would be prudent to let the WG hear the problems from users rather than from >> me. >> >> It all goes back to the fact that the namespace facility as designed back in >> 1999 was a really bad piece of design work. I wish I could find the email >> that I wrote at the time saying "it doesn't matter that it's bad: it's an >> optional feature, and it's so bad that no-one will use it." But I think that >> not using namespaces isn't really an option today: they are too ingrained in >> the ecosystem. >> > :) > > In XSLT generating XHTML from XML in no namespace is straightforward, > doing the same in XQuery is a pain... it's not really a design fault > of namespaces, just a real oddity in XQuery... > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



