• From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:31:13 +0100

On 10 April 2010 00:02, Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote:
>> So, users that are not confused shouldn't worry about
>> namespaces? The problems don't seem too big for such a bad design.
>
> Users who think they don't need to understand namespaces continue to fall
> down the rat-hole at an alarming rate, and many of us on this and similar
> forums have spent 10 years helping them out of the hole, and like to vent
> our frustration occasionally.

Hence the need to follow a simple set of guidelines when you introduce
a namespaces in a mixed dev team, that help avoid most of those
rat-holes.


-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/

• References:
  • To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: David <dlee@c...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Kendall Shaw <kshaw@k...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Max Toro <maxtoroq@g...>
  • RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: Max Toro <maxtoroq@g...>
  • RE: To namespace or not to Namespace ....
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>