• From: "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@h...>
• To: "'Jirka Kosek'" <jirka@k...>
• Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 08:05:46 +0000

Jirka 

Any chance you can use MSXML 5.0? Officially it only installs with Microsoft
Office (2003 I believe) but it seems to work okay if it's registered as a
standard COM component using regsvr32.

Joe
http://joe.fawcett.name/

-----Original Message-----
From: Jirka Kosek [mailto:jirka@k...] 
Sent: 02 March 2010 20:47
To: Richard Salz
Cc: Jonas Mellin; xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  XML Signature/Encryption in MSXML 4.0/6.0

Richard Salz wrote:

> Do you want XML Digitial signature?  Do you know enough to be able to 
> answer that? :)

I don't want them, but I need them -- if that's what you have been asking
for ;-)

> The Gnome XML libraries, and the XMLSec package built on top of that, 
> should compile on Windows.

Thanks, this is possibility but it seems that there is no COM interface for
XMLSec so it would mean additional work to crate one.

--
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@k...      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Signature/Encryption in MSXML 4.0/6.0
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>

• References:
  • XML Signature/Encryption in MSXML 4.0/6.0
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>
  • Re: XML Signature/Encryption in MSXML 4.0/6.0
    • From: Jonas Mellin <jonas.mellin@h...>
  • Re: XML Signature/Encryption in MSXML 4.0/6.0
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
  • Re: XML Signature/Encryption in MSXML 4.0/6.0
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>