RE: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schema
>> >> It's just this kind of thing that gets XML a bad name. The >> horse of XML Schema bolted a long time ago. Making clarity >> suffer in the name of correctness is a poor decision. >> > > Eh? I'm sure it's correct that many people would assume that a W3C > specification for "xml-schema" refers to the W3C specification entitled > "XML > Schema", and that it's therefore better to choose a different name. That's > for the sake of clarity, not for the sake of correctness. I would prefer <?xml-document-type ... ?> myself, but it would have no chance! XSD and RELAX NG Schemas pretty much attach to single namespaces (Schematron doesn't at all) so the document-type is what you get from combining several schemas in order to limit/explain what is allowed in the document. Cheers Rick Jelliffe
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format