Re: Content Assembly Mechanism (CAM)
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:28 PM, <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > Olivier and Lech, > Thanks for your questions. Been a while since I've posted to the xml-dev > list. Really good to hear from you. Sometimes it's wothwhile to stir the honet's nest alittle just to get an excellent response like yours. > I think it is important firstly to determine what the role and purpose of > each flavor of XML schema technology is, and hence what are the strengths > and where you would want to match appropriately to what your needs are. > So if I'm looking at XSD Schema, Relax NG, Schematron, and CAM for me its > pretty clear. You're absolutely right and having just re-read some of the publications on CAM last night, I can clearly see now that the CAM caters for a different use case. > Can CAM do things that XSD + Schematron cannot do? Most certainly - it > combines that into one technology. I'll certainly be looking more into that, it might fit into an ecosystem of what I'm doing really well. Lech
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format