|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com> wrote: > If you're scripting HTML, writing well-formed XHTML makes life vastly more predictable. > The same is true to a lesser extent of CSS. These problems are often underestimated. An example of the problems you can encounter using HTML as a content storage format instead of XHTML or another XML flavor consider the following: <p class="para">text<ol><li>item</li></ol>text</p> If you style this .para using CSS you will see that the second text will not be styled. The <ol> will split the <p> and the class will only be applied to the first text. This structure is not valid HTML, but many HTML oriented tools will allow content authors to create such structure because they are not strict (which is their main benefit). Similarly: <div>text<ol><li>item</li></ol>text</div> vs <div><p>text</p><ol><li>item</li></ol><p>text</p></div> Both are valid HTML and will look the same without CSS, but when you add CSS, both structures will be rendered differently: ol { margin: 0 2em; } These and related issues make restyling an HTML content repository with more pages than you can manually check a nightmare and can make an investment in X(HT)ML worthwhile. Best regards, Laurens van den Oever CEO, Xopus BV http://xopus.com +31 70 4452345 KvK 27301795
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||






