• From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• To: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@c...>
• Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:43:51 +0100

>> How does the
>> receiver determine the appropriate schema when the version is not
>> explicitly referenced?
>
> Why not "try one and if it fails try the other"?

There is a problem with this - the document is a v2 doc but fails for
some reason, so validation falls back to the v1 schema, which also
fails... which error message gets presented to the user?

You want the v2 failure message, but the system can't confidently give you that.




-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Changing Namespaces Between Specification Versions
    • From: Fraser Goffin <goffinf@g...>

• References:
  • RE: Changing Namespaces Between Specification Versions (was: XIN: XML implicit namespace definitions)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: Changing Namespaces Between Specification Versions (was: XIN: XML implicit namespace definitions)
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • RE: Changing Namespaces Between Specification Versions (was: XIN: XML implicit namespace definitions)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: Changing Namespaces Between Specification Versions (was: XIN: XML implicit namespace definitions)
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Changing Namespaces Between Specification Versions (was: XIN: XML implicit namespace definitions)
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • Re: Changing Namespaces Between Specification Versions
    • From: Chuck Bearden <cbearden@r...>
  • Changing Namespaces Between Specification Versions
    • From: Webb Roberts <strebor@g...>
  • Re: Changing Namespaces Between Specification Versions
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>