[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Machine vs Human: The Disputed Territory (was:Syntax versu

  • From: "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@U...>
  • To: "Ken Starks" <ken@l...>,xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:57:04 -0500

RE:  Machine vs Human: The Disputed Territory (was:Syntax versu
So, getting back to Roger's definitions ...

Machines do the syntax drudge work, and wet-ware does the rest (whether
or not you call it "semantics").

Thanks to Rick and Jonas for the back references.

The puzzle pieces are just right, Roger.  Thanks.

Bruce B Cox
Manager, Standards Development Division

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Starks [mailto:ken@l...] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 3:08 PM
To: xml-dev@l...
Cc: costello@m...
Subject: Re:  Machine vs Human: The Disputed Territory (was:
Syntax versus Semantics)

Costello, Roger L. wrote:
> Bruce Cox wrote:
>   There are those operations that: 
>   1) cannot be performed by machine 
>   2) can but aren't performed by machine
>          [it isn't economical,   
>           or we haven't figured 
>          it out yet] 
>   3) are performed by machines
>   The boundary between 2 and 3 
>   is a territory in dispute with daily 
>   skirmishes on several fronts where 
>   there are clear winners on one side 
>   or the other, but with no end to the 
>   overall conflict in sight.  
>   I think the best we can expect is a 
>   certain equilibrium between what 
>   machines can profitably perform 
>   and what humans will profitably perform 
>   The disputed territory moves across the 
>   landscape, but never completely disappears.
> Awesome imagery Bruce! I enjoyed it so much that I created a graphic:
> http://www.xfront.com/machine-vs-human-the-disputed-territory.gif
> /Roger
Although I expect us to get a slap on the wrist for being off-topic, I 
can't resist making a response.

I want to live in Utopia, by the way.

In my world, the one I am trying to build, there will be no conflict 
whatever between humans and machines.
Taking an evolutionary metaphor (i.e. Memes for Genes) it will be a 
supreme example of symbiosis, of
the 'nice guys always win' branch of evolution rather than the 'red in 
tooth and claw' branch.

I want machines to be life-enhancing, never to increase drudgery, so I'm

pretty strong a bit of artificial
selection of collaborative memes and pruning out of drudgery-promoting 

Roger, anyone else, make a graphic of that if you like!


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.