RE: Whither JDOM?
I'd be very surprised if JDOM cares what it finds in an element name: I suspect that if the XML parser accepts XML 1.05 style names, then JDOM will accept them too. But I might be wrong. Do you have any evidence to the contrary? Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Klotz, Leigh [mailto:Leigh.Klotz@x...] > Sent: 19 March 2009 23:16 > To: xml-dev@l... > Subject: Whither JDOM? > > I sent a note to the jdom-interest list about JDOM and XML > 1.0 (5th) production rules for element names, and noticed it > didn't make it to the archives. Then I noticed nothing's new > in the archives since January. > A few quick web searches turned up no tea-leaf reading, and I > didn't see any discussion here either. > > So, anybody have ideas what's going on, and if it's nothing > good, for the prospects of getting JDOM updated? > > Leigh. > > ______________________________________________________________ > _________ > > XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by > OASIS to support XML implementation and development. To > minimize spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. > > [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ > Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l... > subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l... List archive: > http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format