• From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
• To: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@c...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:50:24 +1000

Pete Cordell wrote:
> Original Message From: "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...>
>
>> xsi:type addresses his issue. All it does is say "look what
>> I found", with admittedly clever, rococo elaborateness, not "here is 
>> what you can do".
>
> No need for the attitude.
Sorry, I wasn't criticizing you or your solution, I was just rolling my 
eyes at XSD.

> And rather than directly answering Ian's concern, I was more directly 
> motivated by answering your comment:
Sorry twice, then!

> Even if it is not something he is not prepared to do, it is a 
> documented avenue of what does not work, which in engineering can be 
> as important as documenting what does work!
+1
> I am definitely not saying "look at my great clever solution.  Aren't 
> I wonderful?"
Then let me say it, by way of apology!

Cheers
Rick

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>

• References:
  • Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Ian Mayo" <ianmayo@t...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: Use xsd to specify multiple instances of existing element
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>