• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• To: "'Rodney Boyd'" <rodney.neil.boyd@g...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:57:12 +0100

Xerces and Saxon-SA are both highly conformant. Both have a Java API; Saxon
also has a command line interface. Xerces is free; Saxon-SA costs £30, but
for that I think you get (slightly) better performance, (slightly) better
control over the validation process, and (much) better error messages.

Microsoft's schema processors also have quite a high level of conformance,
the notable exception in my experience being regular expressions, where they
support a rather different regex dialect from the one defined by W3C.

The choice depends a little on what you mean by "batch mode".

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/ 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rodney Boyd [mailto:rodney.neil.boyd@g...] 
> Sent: 15 September 2008 20:17
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject:  XML validator
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Can anyone recommend an XML validator that validates against 
> W3C schemas and can be run in batch mode? It doesn't have to 
> be free, but that would be a bonus. I'm familiar with xsv and 
> xmllint, but am looking for other options.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Rodney Boyd
> Tech writer, XML/XSLT consultant
> (available for contracts)
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> 
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by 
> OASIS to support XML implementation and development. To 
> minimize spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
> 
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l... List archive: 
> http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
> 

• References:
  • XML validator
    • From: "Rodney Boyd" <rodney.neil.boyd@g...>