• From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>
• To: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:49:28 +0530

On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 2:29 PM, bryan rasmussen
<rasmussen.bryan@g...> wrote:
> I agree that it isn't specifically necessary but to say it is not
> useful would be incorrect.

As I wrote earlier, XML prolog information could be properties of the
document node in XPath (2.x). It's upto the applications to make use
of this information.

Does this make any sense?

-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Should we include the XML prolog in the XPath data model, or DOM
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• References:
  • Should we include the XML prolog in the XPath data model, or DOM
    • From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: Should we include the XML prolog in the XPath datamodel, or DOM
    • From: Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...>
  • Re: Should we include the XML prolog in the XPath data model, or DOM
    • From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: Should we include the XML prolog in the XPath data model, or DOM
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>