[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Andrew Welch wrote: > that's an odd question... what makes you think it wouldn't be? > > is a language that can "implement finger trees" more powerful than one > that can't? > Because finger trees seem to need particular kinds or features of generics. If Java's generics don't support the required features, then there would need to be all sorts of hoops to implement it well. Cheers Rick
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



