- From: COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@a...>
- To: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:49:12 +0200
Hello,
From my point of view, the prolog is just useful for parsing :
- version="1.0" : just in case another version would exist in the
future (multiple roots, multiple relationships,...)
- encoding="..." : so the parser can interpret correctly and
convert the following characters !
DOM is just concerned by the document in memory where just one encoding
is used (UTF-32 for example).
XPath expressions are written as strings which could use a different
encoding...
The result tree of DOM API calls or of XSL transformations is usually
saved or transfered : another encoding is necessary so the prolog has
to be written when serializing.
Alain COUTHURES
<agenceXML>
http://www.agencexml.com
Bordeaux, France
Mukul Gandhi a écrit :
7870f82e0809200524j372de030o9346bf7789124ec4@m..."
type="cite">
Hi all,
I wrote the following blog post. This is perhaps a weird thought,
for people having worked with XML for long.
http://mukulgandhi.blogspot.com/2008/09/should-we-include-version10-in-xpath.html
This is a short description of the points I have in mind.
Could you please let us know, if my logic have any merit.
|
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|
Cart
