[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Dave Cridland wrote:
> ...
> 11) Section 4.2.17: Does that "type" attribute totally [expletive deleted]? Of course,
> you have to have it because every man, his dog, and his pet hampster has
> decided that only HTTP is allowed, these days, for absolutely
> everything, leading to a totally useless URI scheme which essentially
> fails to describe the actual resource it's supposedly a locator for.
> Okay, rant over, back to the review.
> ...
"4.2.17. The "metalink:url" Element
The "metalink:url" element contains the IRI of a file. All IRIs
should lead to identical files, except in the case of type
"bittorrent" where the IRI should lead to a .torrent file."
Actually, don't do that. Don't make the meaning of an element totally
dependent on an attribute on it. If torrent files are a special case
(can there be more...?), then define a separate element.
BR, Julian
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



