Re: Is it time for eRDF 1.1?
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Micah Dubinko <Micah.Dubinko@m...> wrote: > ERDF is a community spec for embedding RDF triples in valid HTML or XHTML. > That is, no additional elements, attributes, or namespaces need to be > defined. > > http://research.talis.com/2005/erdf/wiki/Main/RdfInHtml I like it, some comments; title attribute: I think the consensus is that this is not used too heavily for any SEO type rankings, though most browsers use em to generate tool tips. I wonder if anyone has submitted such an example page to any search engines to see what it does in terms of ranking. class & id attribute: these are general purpose attributes ... though many years spent with designers has informed me that they are a pretty pessimistic and somewhat jealous group. I know in their minds they think 'I own the class attribute' and if we start using it for our nefarious semantic purposes then they will push back. I think something pragmatic can come of this approach but I think it would be useful to do a 'litmus' test on a group of designers at this stage. cheers, Jim Fuller > With all the activity around RDFa, now an increasingly-implemented W3C > Candidate Rec, I wonder it if's time to revisit eRDF and perhaps bring it > into closer alignment? > > http://dubinko.info/blog/2008/07/28/erdf-11-proposal-discussion/ > > I'm interested in anyone's thoughts on this. > > Thanks, -m
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format