[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: A curiosity? was NVDL: A Disruptive Technology

• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• To: 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 11:45:01 +0100

I'm really quite intrigued by this thread. Very little has been about 
NVDL (good/bad/indifferent), much about the schema language permathread.

I didn't even see the OP as contentious.

NVDL seems to add another tool to the toolbag. Use it. Ignore it,
pull it out when needed. It works, does what it says on the tin.

Any ideas just why it  generates such a varied response?


regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: A curiosity? was NVDL: A Disruptive Technology
    • From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller.2007@g...>
  • Re: A curiosity? was NVDL: A Disruptive Technology
    • From: Manos Batsis <manos_lists@g...>

• References:
  • RE: NVDL: A Disruptive Technology
    • From: Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...>
  • RE: NVDL: A Disruptive Technology
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: NVDL: A Disruptive Technology
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • RE: NVDL: A Disruptive Technology
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>