• From: Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...>
• To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
• Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 18:08:04 +0200

Costello, Roger L. a écrit :
> For example, instead of this:
> 
> 
>    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
>    <xsl:stylsheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
>                   version="2.0">
>        ...
>    </xsl:stylesheet>
> 
> 
> Write this:
> 
> 
>    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
>    <trn:transform xmlns:trn="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
>                   version="2.0">
>        ...
>    </trn:transform>

People won't understand it if you mail snippet codes :

<trn:template match="foo">
Do we talk about XSLT ? Why the guy didn't use <xsl:template> like 
everybody ?

We all know that a prefix doesn't care sense, but this applies only for 
computers, humans have habits and the prefix "xsl" is tightly coupled to 
XSLT

-- 
Cordialement,

               ///
              (. .)
  --------ooO--(_)--Ooo--------
|      Philippe Poulard       |
  -----------------------------
  http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/
        Have the RefleX !

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why is there an "S" in XSLT?
    • From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>

• References:
  • Why is there an "S" in XSLT?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Why is there an "S" in XSLT?
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • RE: Why is there an "S" in XSLT?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>