Re: NVDL: A Disruptive Technology
> > All I'm saying is, don't make a virtue out of it. The world would be a > better place if everyone used the same XML validation language, assuming > that language met all the requirements (and there's no intrinsic reason why > one language shouldn't meet all the requirements). Having multiple languages > coexisting just adds cost and complexity, just as mixing programming > languages in an application adds cost and complexity. No-one wants to do it > if they can avoid it. This is exactly what the W3C XML Schema people said to me when I was there. I have had a different opinion since then, and have not changed my mind. I do not intend to continue religious discussions here. But let's review the current status of W3C XML Schema. REALX NG can capture co-occurrence constraints between attributes and elements but W3C XML Schema cannot. Schematron can capture advanced integrity constraints but W3C XML Schema 1.0 cannot. The W3C XML Schema WG certainly admits this in "Requirements for XML Schema 1.1". More about this, see "126.96.36.199 Add co-constraints (RQ-38)". Although the W3C XML Schema WG has been trying for five years, W3C XML Schema 1.1 is still a working draft. This is a strong empirical reason that one language does not meet all the requirements. Cheers, -- MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@a...>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format