• From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>
• To: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 18:56:30 +0530

On 5/12/08, Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote:
> All I'm saying is, don't make a virtue out of it. The world would be a
> better place if everyone used the same XML validation language, assuming
> that language met all the requirements (and there's no intrinsic reason why
> one language shouldn't meet all the requirements). Having multiple languages
> coexisting just adds cost and complexity, just as mixing programming
> languages in an application adds cost and complexity. No-one wants to do it
> if they can avoid it.

I agree with Mike, but also favour NVDL for the innovations it brings.

-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

• References:
  • NVDL: A Disruptive Technology
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: NVDL: A Disruptive Technology
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...>
  • RE: NVDL: A Disruptive Technology
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • RE: NVDL: A Disruptive Technology
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>