• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• To: "'Alexander Johannesen'" <alexander.johannesen@g...>,<andrzej@c...>
• Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:53:11 -0000

> However, I was more pointing to the fact that the word 
> "resource" is really whatever you make of it, including 
> objects (whatever you make "object" out to be). :)

It's pretty clear to me that the people who chose the words "object" and
"resource" were both trying to make the concepts as general as they could
possibly make them, and therefore by intent they are equivalent. If there is
a difference, then I don't think it's one that the originators of the terms
intended.


Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Objects at REST...
    • From: "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@c...>
  • Re: Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST...
    • From: "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...>

• References:
  • Objects at REST...
    • From: "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@c...>
  • Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST...
    • From: "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...>
  • Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST...
    • From: "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@c...>
  • Re: [rest-discuss] Objects at REST...
    • From: "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...>