[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...>
  • To: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>, 'Mukul Gandhi' <gandhi.mukul@g...>, "'Costello, Roger L.'" <costello@m...>
  • Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:24:24 -0600

So, is XML statistically meaningless prior to applying a process or only statistically meaningful without one?    I'm not a Chomskyan but I'm not a rabbit either.

 

It's in the way that you use it.   IOW, '**Use** semantic markup' is the answer to the question it is part of.

 

I'm surprised this thread is back.   Roger, did you have any particular goal for this?

 

len

 


From: Richard Salz [mailto:rsalz@u...]
 


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorless_green_ideas_sleep_furiously

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member