• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• To: "'John Snelson'" <john.snelson@o...>,"'Henri Sivonen'" <hsivonen@i...>
• Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:56:58 -0000

> An XSLT 2.0 processor is also a perfectly good XSLT 1.0 
> processor for the large majority of use cases. The 
> incompatibilities between XSLT 2.0 in backwards compatible 
> mode and XSLT 1.0 are detailed here:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#incompatibilities

For XPath the relevant reference is:

http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#id-incompat-in-true-mode

as modified by erratum XP.E2:

http://www.w3.org/XML/2007/qt-errata/xpath20-errata.html#E2

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• References:
  • Using Saxon 9 as a Schematron 1.5 back end
    • From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@i...>
  • Re: Using Saxon 9 as a Schematron 1.5 back end
    • From: John Snelson <john.snelson@o...>