Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
David Carlisle a écrit :
>> A useful output is what I called a canonical path, a structure composed
>> of 2 parts :
>> -an XPath expression that starts from the root and descend from node to
>> node by naming them and index them
>> -a mapping of the prefixes involved in the XPath expressions
>
>
> For this usage, the (ISO) schematron skeleton files include templates
> that output xpaths (not using any prefixes) to the context of the
> message. (It also has templates that make xpaths with prefixes, suitable
> for human readable error messages, but in many XPath API, it's just
> simpler to report something as
> /*[10]/*[5]
> rather than
> /a:b[3]/c:d[2]
> and then worry how to bind the namespace prefixes.
>
Surely. We can find cases when one is better that the other. Naming
elements has the advantage that in many cases we can identify the
element in fault at a glance.
--
Cordialement,
///
(. .)
--------ooO--(_)--Ooo--------
| Philippe Poulard |
-----------------------------
http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/
Have the RefleX !
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
