RE: increment pattern for an attribute..
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 10:12 +0000, Michael Kay wrote: > > If you were desparate, you could try the following hack: > > I think the tag structure is a bit wobbly - but I think I know what you are > getting at. But it surely violates the XSDL rule that if two element > particles in a content model have the same name then they must have the same > type. Doh, I knew that...last month: it came up as an issue with a client's schema! It is not a problem with UPA but with "Element Declarations Consistent". Of course, RELAX NG can do this kind of thing no problems. I see the new XSD 1.1 draft has no difference in this regard. I've been spending a bit more time using XSD recently, both for the XSD to Schematron converter project (description and code at XML.COM) and for an ACORD project. XSD seems to have hit that magical middlepoint where it is convenient for neither implementers nor users. XSD is so full of distinctions without (necessary) difference, which only serve to complicate. Really, what is the need for the language to have <group> or <attributeGroup> when it could ramp up <complexType> to fulfill the role (more like RELAX NG patterns)? Why is there a distinction between derivation by union and choice groups? Why is there a distinction between derivation by extension and sequence groups? Why are substitution groups not explained in terms of choice groups? And why cannot something be both a string and a number? (i.e. why isn't some genus of string the simple urtype, since the value-space facets of the urtype are shonky propositions anyway) If we can have NaN like NotANumber why cannot we have NotABoolean and so on? Cheers Rick Jelliffe
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format