• From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:46:47 +1000

On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 11:54 +0100, Michael Kay wrote:
 
> But that's not why they weren't included. It was more a desire to simplify
> things for users and for implementors.

Well at least it achieved that for the implementors. Because it
certainly does not simplify things for users. 

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • RE: The <any/> element: bane of security or savior of versioning?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • RE: The <any/> element: bane of security or savior of versioning?
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
  • RE: The <any/> element: bane of security or savior ofversioning?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • RE: The <any/> element: bane of security or savior ofversioning?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • RE: The <any/> element: bane of security or saviorofversioning?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • RE: The <any/> element: bane of security or saviorofversioning?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>