• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: rasmussen.bryan@g...
• Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:06:26 +0100

> > Let us suppose we have an any allowed in the the following xml
> > fragment

But my point was, suppose you disallowed <any/>  what does that buy you
if the schema uses lax validation (or your schema validator starts off
in lax mode by default) or any one of hundreds of other possible issues.
I can't see why <any/> is being singled out here.

David

________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________

• References:
  • The <any/> element: bane of security or savior of versioning?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: The <any/> element: bane of security or savior of versioning?
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: The <any/> element: bane of security or savior of versioning?
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
  • Re: The <any/> element: bane of security or savior of versioning?
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
  • Re: The <any/> element: bane of security or savior of versioning?
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>