• From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
• To: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:51:01 -0400

Why do you need a pojo at all?

Why not just use the element in some form like dom4j, xom or jdom?

Or use mozilla's Rhino and make use of E4X.

best, 
-Rob


On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 15:46 +0100, Andrew Welch wrote:
> On 11/10/2007, Pete Cordell <petexmldev@t...> wrote:
> > One thing I did mean to mention is that, from what I have read, XMLBeans
> > alleges to take a slightly different approach to databinding from other
> > tools.  Unfortunately I can't remember what this is!
> 
> It can round trip documents, and can preserve mixed content ordering
> (or something like that, again I haven't given it enough time to do it
> justice).
> 
> > Also, have to tried JAXB?
> 
> I tried it several years ago, say 4 years ago and struggled with it.
> I can't remember why, but it could well have been writing the
> requisite schema, parts of which I now understand :)
> 
> Either way, I'm back to extending good old DefaultHandler, which was
> born from this list :)
> 
> 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: From Pox to Pojo
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>

• References:
  • From Pox to Pojo
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: From Pox to Pojo
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...>
  • Re: From Pox to Pojo
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Re: From Pox to Pojo
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...>
  • Re: From Pox to Pojo
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>