• From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@n...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:11:12 +0300

Jonathan,

JR> Hmmm, like when you have a C++ program using ODBC, using escapes to get
JR> SQL strings to fit into C++,
-1

JR> and that SQL contains SQL/XML extensions
JR> that look rather different from conventional SQL, and those SQL/XML
JR> extensions contain XQueries, with appropriate escaping so it doesn't
JR> confuse the SQL interpreter?
+1

JR> I agree with you that a pure XML environment really is a lot easier ....
-1


Dmitry Turin
SQL5      (5.5.2)  http://sql50.euro.ru
HTML6     (6.4.3)  http://html60.euro.ru
Unicode7  (7.2.1)  http://unicode70.euro.ru
Computer2 (2.0.2)  http://computer20.euro.ru

• References:
  • XQuery & Several records (instead of one xml-field)
    • From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@n...>
  • RE: XQuery & Several records (instead of one xml-field)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: XQuery & Several records (instead of one xml-field)
    • From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XQuery & Several records (instead of one xml-field)
    • From: Jim Melton <jim.melton@a...>
  • Re: XQuery & Several records (instead of one xml-field)
    • From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XQuery & Several records (instead of one xml-field)
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • RE: XQuery & Several records (instead of one xml-field)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: XQuery & Several records (instead of one xml-field)
    • From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • RE: XQuery & Several records (instead of one xml-field)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: XQuery & Several records (instead of one xml-field)
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...>