• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...>
• To: "'XML Developers List'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 17:04:07 +1000 (EST)

Michael Kay said:

> That's an absurd distortion of what I said.

Oh good, I am glad you think it is absurd to. You had me worried for a
minute!

> I would say the process has been corrupted if people are voting when the
> issue does not affect them directly, but only to demonstrate loyalty to
> their business "partners".

Now that you add this "if", I think you have a point. Unless they have
particular expertise or want to ramp up their experience for some future
involvement or are there as a legitimate proxy because someone cannot
attend or are there in an 'honest broker' role, I don't see any need for
people who would not benefit from that standard to partipicate or vote.

But "corrupt" is still not a synonym for "less than ideal" and
unnecessarily provocative.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
    • From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...>
  • Re: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...>
  • RE: Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>