[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Michael Kay wrote: > (b) will it > reduce the costs or increase the compensatory benefits of that monopoly to > the user community. Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: >> No, It won't. Specification of OOXML will accomplish that, but >> standardization will not do more than simple specification would. I'm reminded we discussed ISO standardization of XML on this list and in an open meeting at XML DevCon in San Jose. Edd Dumbill's synopsis of that long-ago meeting is an interesting read in light of the heated debate over ISO standards for office document formats. Seven years ago the mindset of many in this community was that ISO standards are unnecessary and irrelevant. Apparently that is no longer the case. "Should XML Become a "Real" Standard?" http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2000/11/devcon/standards.html "... Jonathan Borden of the Open Healthcare Group, Paul Byron of Health Level 7, and Alan Kotok of DISA discussed the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) as a case study of using standards as part of legal mandates... The discussion noted that when standards become legal mandates rather than voluntary, the top priority becomes compliance with the law. ... Other participants questioned the benefits that may result from ISO standardization of APIs or XML as a whole, and noted that some ISO standards, even those that were open and tightly designed, do not necessarily attract a large following. Tim Bray, co-editor of the XML 1.0 specification, asked the meeting participants for a show of hands as to who was in favor of an ISO standard for XML. Aside from about three people, no one else responded. " _________ Ken North ________ www.KNComputing.com www.WebServicesSummit.com www.SQLSummit.com www.GridSummit.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



