• From: Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...>
• To: Tim.Bray@S..., Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...>
• Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:27:50 -0500

I don't disagree the merging what is identical is a good proposal.  Yet
adding extra burdens to the current process would guarantee it will fail.

As I said to Jonathan in my last post, post-process proposals can take that
up as a new work item for a third or fourth standard.

len


From: Tim.Bray@S... [mailto:Tim.Bray@S...] 
 
On Sep 6, 2007, at 6:38 AM, Jonathan Robie wrote:

> OOXML didn't make it in the first round balloting for fast track  
> acceptance. What should happen now?

Here are some outcomes that I think would be good:

1. The parts of ODF & OOXML that are identical, e.g. "A left- 
justified ragged-right paragraph, foreground #0a0000 background  
#ffffff, Georgia 11pt, 1.2leading, no widow/orphan control" are  
merged.  The world does *not* need two ways to express this.  It  
doesn't really matter that much which XML vocabulary is used for this  
purpose.  Then there's a separate specification for all the extra  
stuff that Office does but ODF doesn't cover.

2. OOXML, maybe with some cleanup, is published in a public, stable  
location in a stable format, with a public, formal commitment from  
Microsoft that they will support this as specified in future releases  
of the Office product suite and won't litigate against anyone who  
writes  software either to read or to generate this format for any  
purpose whatsoever.

The task of addressing all ten thousand or so ISO-member comments,  
even after removing dupes, and dealing with the callouts to  
unspecified product behavior, and so on, with no assurance that doing  
so would result in ISO blessing, seems just insanely expensive and  
difficult to me.  If those guys take it on, they have my respect and  
sympathy.  -T



_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.