[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Hi Pete, Thanks for the answer, and all the useful information. I really like your idea about polymorphic usage of types. Thanks for telling me about this. On 9/20/07, Pete Cordell <petexmldev@t...> wrote: > As you've discovered, schema does not allow you to use xs:extension on > xs:all. This may change in XSD 1.1, but is something we have to live with > for the time being. > > The easiest thing to do is change your xs:all statements to xs:sequence. As > you've noted, this would require the order to be fixed, but it's worth > considering whether you really need the order to be variable. > > Another approach that would work in this case would be to use attributes to > store the data. In this case the order would not matter, and the semantics > of what is allowed in terms of occurrences is very much xs:all like. > > Another observation is that, if you want your OBJECTS element to be more OO > polymorphic like, the you could define it something like: > > <xs:element name="OBJECTS"> > <xs:complexType> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:element name="object" type="shape" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > </xs:sequence> > </xs:complexType> > </xs:element> > > XML instances of that will look something like: > > <OBJECTS> > <object xsi:type='circle'...>...</object> > <object xsi:type='rectangle'...>...</object> > </OBJECT> > etc. > > HTH, > > Pete. > -- > ============================================= > Pete Cordell > Codalogic > for XML Schema to C++ data binding visit > http://www.codalogic.com/lmx/ > ============================================= -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



