Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Michael Kay wrote: > Office and Windows are good products and are highly successful because they > meet user needs, but they are also outrageously profitable. The high profits > are derived essentially because (a) there's a natural tendency in the user > community to converge on a single product, thus creating an effective > monopoly, and (b) the beneficiary of such a monopoly also benefits from the > existence of a copyright law that was designed to reward individual > impoverished writers but now allows mega-corporations to exploit the very > individuals it was designed to protect. > Another factor: exchanging office files with anyone was once very difficult, because there were quite a few competing programs, and they didn't do that great a job of reading and writing each other's formats. They were often bad even at handling their own earlier formats. Many environments were eager to see one file format win. RTF was one non-XML format that was trying to play this role. An XML format has real advantages for this. Docbook never became that format. So far, ODF hasn't either. OOXML will make it easier to read Microsoft's data, but I'd be surprised if it becomes the universal document exchange format, partly because it is 6,000 pages and not fully specified. Not sure if we'll ever get there .... Jonathan
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
