Re: XML dictionary - second try
Michael Kay wrote: >> This looks like what I need, but it is quite complicated... I >> was expected something simpler. >> >> > > Generic schemas are always more complicated than you expect. That's because > your requirements are a subset of the requirements of the community as a > whole, often quite a small subset. A published generic schema will tend to > be the union of everyone's requirements. > In that case it might be better to develop my own "quick" version. I will have to explain a small set of rules to the partner sites, otherwise I need to explain this generic specification which is much more complex. I am thinking what is the best trade-off. Regards, Razvan N.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format