Re: RDDL: new natures
Jonathan Borden wrote: eople should have a look at http://www.rddl.org/20050704/ for a > look at what we are proposing as a new version of RDDL -- it is > intended to be backward compatible with the current RDDL, but also > allows the form <a rddl:purpose="..." rddl:nature="..."> instead of the > <rddl:resource> form which uses XLink. In the tradition of RDDL I am > hoping to get a final version of this out soon, so comments are welcome > for folks who haven't seen this yet. > The internal links from the TOC seem broken. I'm not sure why. Hmm, it looks like section 7 ios completely missing: 7. RDDL Attributes 1. rddl:nature 2. rddl:purpose is in the TOC but not in the spec so it's hard to comment on this. :-) -- ï»¿Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@m... Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeaulait.org/books/javaio2/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596527500/ref=nosim/cafeaulaitA/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format