[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Hello, those who are still interested in "lisp vs xml" and "xml is a poor copy of s-expressions" issues, might find my recent writings interesting: Towards s-expression based XPath/XSLT implementation http://xmlhack.ru/protva/xquery/index.php/TowardsXslt Abstract: It's supposed that Lisp languages are ideal for implementing XML standards. Then why we don't have an XSLT processor written in Common Lisp or Scheme? I'm ignoring business issues and want to expose a technical problem. The popular representations of XML become showstoppers in implementing hidden XML/XPath/XSLT features. In this paper, I try to list the issues, both generic and specific to the representations: * object oriented, * DSSSL, * SXML. Also I record some low-level issues related to implementing XPath and XSLT. Finally, I introduce GSXML, a dialect of SXML. -- Oleg Parashchenko olpa@ http://xmlhack.ru/ XML news in Russian http://uucode.com/blog/ Generative Programming, XML, TeX, Scheme XSieve at XTech 2006: http://xtech06.usefulinc.com/schedule/detail/44
|

Cart



