• To: peter murray-rust <pm286@c...>
• Subject: Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality
• From: Bill Humphries <bill@w...>
• Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:23:15 -0700
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.0.20060723192020.04435ec0@c...>
• References: <B8415163A689094689542C617ECA0366E03F8C@I...> <7.0.1.0.0.20060723192020.04435ec0@c...>

On Jul 23, 2006, at 12:05 PM, peter murray-rust wrote:

> If we were to do this, and if CLAX (or whatever name it evolves to)  
> were to generate the same sort of interest as SAX, REST and AJAX,  
> then we could reasonably ask many communities to prepare CLAX-aware  
> clients. With Java, for example, we believe this to be reasonably  
> tractable with Maven, .war delivery, etc. What it needs is an  
> agreed specification that generates enough acceptance by a fast  
> moving community.

This sounds like something a smart web proxy ought to be able to  
handle 80% of?

-- whump

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality
    • From: Tei <oscar.vives@g...>
  • Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality
    • From: peter murray-rust <pm286@c...>

• References:
  • [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • CLAX - Client-side functionality
    • From: peter murray-rust <pm286@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: CLAX - Client-side functionality - OFFTOPIC,Firefox supports SVG
• Next by Date: OFFTOPIC, Firefox supports SVG
• Previous by thread: OFFTOPIC, Firefox supports SVG
• Next by thread: Re: CLAX - Client-side functionality
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread