• To: "Ian Graham" <ian.graham@u...>
• Subject: Re: Default namespace for attributes?
• From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>
• Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 10:10:51 +0530
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=A79fTal17TorU5/YKNi1NxoJPyEjXcrabZXj9c+9zCBm4GX4JL8ivZ9/hreJ8ryQ3OgfSlWOqLoc4ebsQa3kfkCI9/vIU57LqxiMYHvrC8dmoiyGcs7cvU2aGlftfKGBewVCjMFpqvftPuD5Invqp0Z0nIUJsSnX3cyo5YbdUMo=
• In-reply-to: <44B93268.6020700@u...>
• References: <7870f82e0607151005nd7094fboc43dd7ecdc9b360a@m...> <44B93268.6020700@u...>

Thanks for sharing the link to this article.

But unfortunately,  James Clark's article below doesn't answer my
question. It just says "Note that the xmlns attribute does not affect
unprefixed attribute names". There is no explanation that why this is
so?

Regards,
Mukul

On 7/15/06, Ian Graham <ian.graham@u...> wrote:
> This is an often confusing part of the spec.  You may find James Clark's
> alternative explanation helpful:
>
> http://www.jclark.com/xml/xmlns.htm
>
> Ian

• References:
  • Default namespace for attributes?
    • From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: Default namespace for attributes?
    • From: Ian Graham <ian.graham@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Default namespace for attributes?
• Next by Date: Re: Default namespace for attributes?
• Previous by thread: Re: Default namespace for attributes?
• Next by thread: Re: Default namespace for attributes?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread