• To: "xml-dev@l... Developers" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
• Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:07:45 +1000
• In-reply-to: <8735FF90-25DA-4B6B-BD33-C9692B884AC0@e...>
• References: <OFC114C604.C6508872-ON8525719D.005E9CC9-8525719D.005EC7EE@u...> <8735FF90-25DA-4B6B-BD33-C9692B884AC0@e...>
• User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420)

Robin Berjon wrote:
> On Jun 30, 2006, at 19:15, Richard Salz wrote:
>> Sorry for the confusion.  I meant that since vendors have to implement
>> part 2, they probably figure "might as well do part 1, while we're at 
>> it."
>
> I certainly hope no one thinks that way, because it would be a 
> terrible, terrible mistake!

It's a particularly mad argument isn't it :-)   Surely there is a better 
argument against RELAX NG than that it will somehow force vendors to 
implement XSD part 1?

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces and attributes..
• Next by Date: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Previous by thread: Namespaces and attributes..
• Next by thread: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread