• To: "'Evert | Collab'" <evert@c...>,"'Alain Pannetier'" <alain.m.pannetier@g...>
• Subject: RE: Namespaces and attributes..
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 22:08:01 +0100
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <44A6D3D7.6040101@c...>
• Thread-index: AcadSEqDQcFFWXhaT5e+5JjJ3F/F/gACfKZw

> 
> Is there a chance if some (XSD enabled or not)parsers will 
> run into problems with the unqualified method? For example.. 
> they could give the attribute the wrong namespace?

There are some pretty buggy schema processors around, but "unqualified" is
the default for attributes, and the value that is used about 95% of the
time, so a processor that didn't accept it wouldn't survive for long.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• References:
  • Re: Namespaces and attributes..
    • From: Evert | Collab <evert@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces and attributes..
• Next by Date: Re: Namespaces and attributes..
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespaces and attributes..
• Next by thread: Re: Namespaces and attributes..
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread