• To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
• Subject: Re: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
• From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:45:53 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <B8415163A689094689542C617ECA0366DA6267@I...>

> There didn?t seem to be any objection to the assertion that HTML is 
> the primary markup language for the visible Web, and that XML is not
> appropriate for the visible Web.

My problem with the assertion is that it seems tautological.  It's like 
saying 'most English speakers prefer English' -- if you're defining the 
web through a browser-based (-biased? :) view, then anything other than 
almost-all HTML would be quite surprising.

        /r$

--
SOA Appliances
Application Integration Middleware

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>

• References:
  • RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>

• Prev by Date: Schema Extension and validation of an instance
• Next by Date: RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
• Next by thread: RE: RE: Why is there little usage of XML on the "visible Web"?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread