• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win
• From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 14:35:53 -0500
• In-reply-to: <3172.217.124.69.240.1153047195.squirrel@w...>
• Thread-index: AcaoxmSJ4LN7uSUuRHqPB/1dv77NOwASEngQ
• Thread-topic: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win

But if a solution works most of the time for most of the people who can
keep the solution in their heads instead of in the rules of an editor
(free or not-free), you can't kill that solution.  It's true of
technology, religion, and pop songs.  What is easily memorized remains.

http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2006/07/comparing_xml_office_document
.html

len

• References:
  • Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win
    • From: <juanrgonzaleza@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Default namespace for attributes?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Default namespace for attributes?
• Previous by thread: Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win
• Next by thread: Re: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread