• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: The Best Technologies Don't Win
• From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:57:27 -0400
• In-reply-to: <1152539647.6003.71.camel@l...>
• References: <7411F30464DC9C479FB14CFD348D71D9869B9E@U...> <1152539647.6003.71.camel@l...>
• User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)

Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> Le lundi 10 juillet 2006 à 08:43 -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) a
> écrit :
>> There are no winners and losers.  
> 
> Good, this is the first time we do agree.
> 
> But why this title "The Best Technologies Don't Win" and this trailing
> sentence "Chalk up another win for objectivism." in your post that
> started this thread, then?

I think he might mean the looters are currently enjoying the situation, 
but it might come back and bite them in the ass when/if the shrug 
happens (if I know my Aynnie)

-Rob

> 
> Eric
> 

• References:
  • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>
  • RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win
• Next by Date: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win
• Previous by thread: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win
• Next by thread: RE: The Best Technologies Don't Win
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread