Re: 10th anniversary of the annoucement of XML ..need he
--- David Carlisle <davidc@n...> wrote: ... > > some ugly wikis use tags, for apparently no good > > reason, along with non-tag markup -- if you want > > cheap-o tags, just use HTML)? > > Unlike XML, SGML's concrete syntax isn't fixed, it > isn't restricted to > using <..> syntax for tags, or even any (explict) > tags at all. > > I just asked google to turn up a link to sgml short > ref maps and it > gave me the article that Rick was talking about.. > > http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2004/03/03/sgmlwiki.html Thanks! That does explain it. And I thought I knew SGML to some degree... but apparently not enough of its more powerful features that allow full re-definition of markup. -+ Tatu +- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format