• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
• Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:46:19 +1000
• In-reply-to: <1151647249.3816.109.camel@l...>
• References: <7C80003DF5F4D640840D0D37250C143E01A1035F@R...> <44A303FA.10409@k...> <44A34133.8040507@x...> <44A37EC7.2050606@k...> <44A49A67.2040207@x...> <1151647249.3816.109.camel@l...>
• User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420)

Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> That's probably not enough to make bug guys even notice, but I keep on
> strongly recommending them for this reason and their support of RELAX NG
> might be one of the reason of their increasing popularity. 
>
> Eric
>   

Ha, that is a good Freudian slip Eric: you said "bug guys" when you 
probably meant "bug guys" :-)

Rick

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • RE: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
    • From: "Stan Kitsis" <skits@m...>
  • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>
  • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
    • From: Michael Champion <mchampion@x...>
  • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>
  • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
    • From: Michael Champion <mchampion@x...>
  • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Next by Date: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Previous by thread: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Next by thread: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread